Latest briefs Browse latest →
Supreme Court Limits Cisco Lawsuit
The Supreme Court rules against a Cisco lawsuit over alleged China surveillance, narrowing Falun Gong plaintiffs' path in U.S. courts
Full visual brief
Follow the story
Sources & verification
Reporting behind this brief, checked before publication.
Brief text
The court’s decision could have broader implications for whether companies can be held liable for aiding in international human rights abuses.
- Frame 1The Supreme Court rules against a Cisco lawsuit over alleged China surveillance, narrowing Falun Gong plaintiffs' path in U.S. courts.
- Frame 2The justices reversed a lower court ruling that revived the 2011 case under the Alien Tort Statute.
- Frame 3Plaintiffs alleged Cisco knowingly built technology China used to surveil and persecute Falun Gong members.
- Frame 4The case tested whether companies can face U.S. liability for aiding and abetting abuses abroad.
- Frame 5The lawsuit accused San Jose-based Cisco of designing the Golden Shield internet surveillance system for China.
- Frame 6The ruling narrows the path for future overseas human rights cases to proceed in U.S. courts.
How this was checked
- Reporting
- Cross-checked across 2 sources
- Claims
- We checked the names, dates, numbers, and core facts against the reporting linked above
- Artwork
- This is an editorial illustration based on the reporting, not source photography
- Published
- Jun 23, 3:16 PM EDT
- Our standards
- Editorial standards and corrections