Visual brief Money 1 source

State Election-Betting Rules Split Prediction Markets

State laws now force a market-law map: 32 states restrict election wagers while prediction platforms sell yes-or-no contracts

Jun 29, 2:17 PM EDT Checked against the primary source

Full visual brief

In this brief

Continue understanding

Follow the story

Reporting behind this brief, checked before publication.

Brief text

Pew found 32 states restrict election betting in some form as prediction-market platforms and federal regulators challenge state gambling laws.

Frame 1State laws now force a market-law map: 32 states restrict election wagers while prediction platforms sell yes-or-no contracts.
Frame 2A rules ledger splits 23 full-ban states from nine partial-restriction states, with separate actor limits.
Frame 3A market board shows Kalshi and Polymarket contracts framed as financial products, not house-set casino bets.
Frame 4State bills and agency letters add taxes, age gates, licensing rules, lawsuits, and official-use limits.
Frame 5Minnesota's statewide platform ban sits beside Kentucky taxes, Tennessee felony rules, operator checks, and contract limits.
Frame 6A CFTC court docket asks whether federal market authority can outrun state gambling laws.

How this was checked

Reporting: Checked against the primary source
Claims: We checked the names, dates, numbers, and core facts against the reporting linked above
Artwork: This is an editorial illustration based on the reporting, not source photography
Published: Jun 29, 2:17 PM EDT
Our standards: Editorial standards and corrections